Archive for August 2005

Stress, money, and brokenness

I wonder how much money is spent annually worldwide immediately after uttering the following phrase to oneself:

Dammit. I give up. I’m (getting a new one / calling a repairman).

Many times I think to myself: I could fix that. All I have to go is buy A, B, C, and D, then spend 3 hours cobbling it together and then it would work again. A lot of times I then dismiss the solution as I’d rather not waste the time to save something so easily replaced or professionally repaired. A similar mentality exists for repairing software in computers. Here’s a short list of things I’d rather not fix unless I’m bored:

  • Windows
  • Firefox profiles
  • Printers
  • MP3 ID3 tags
  • DNS tables
  • Laptop PCs
  • Someone else’s code

And here’s a short list of things I’d consider fixing:

  • Sandals
  • Lamps
  • Backpacks
  • Door locks
  • Leaky faucets
  • SQL table data
  • Recipes
  • Desktop PCs
  • My code
Tagged as: , , , , ,
Categorized as: Questions

Straight talk about the middle

Sometimes it’s hard to say what I really mean without sounding preachy. For example: I would like to say that if you believe in intelligent design or creationism you should phrase omitted. Unfortunately, any way that I think to fill in that blank seems to make me no worse than the extremists who want their kids to never see a boob or get their feelings hurt in school.

It’s really hard to keep my scientist’s veneer when I don’t often have any facts to support my subconsious urges to maim when people spew sewage from their mouths all over the public.

And this is where the whole problem with moderates comes to play. The only people who seem to loudly and openly share their viewpoints with the rest of the world are the folks who sit at the far ends of the scales. And of all the people you want around for debates and arguments, they are the absolute worst choices. They are people who cannot be swayed in their opinions.

Recently, Jon Stewart had Rick Santorum on The Daily Show. In the middle of the interview Jon came to the conclusion that he was never going to get Rick to budge in his views on anything—and that was effectively where the real meat of the interview ended. You can’t have a reasonable debate if no one is willing to concede in anyway. At that point, what you have instead of a debate is a “who has the biggest reproductive organs” shouting match. People like Bill O’Reilly, Ann Coulter, and Tucker Carlson really get off on this kinda thing.

What happens is that people who are willing to listen to reasonable debate, to non-extremist opinions, to civilized discourse are being drowned out and ignored by just about every talking-head that exists. It’s so bad that it’s hard to tell if anybody is actually out there who talks sensically anymore, or if everyone in the big middle of the spectrum just gave up a long time ago. The closest thing we have is Comedy Central’s The Daily Show with Jon Stewart. I think there is something very important to learn about the state of affairs when the only possibility of a useful television news broadcast has to come from a network devoted to comedy.

Any time that faith intersects with science (or with anything else) you end up with a horribly exothermic reaction. On one side is a bunch of folks who are used sharing their beliefs and opinions rather vocally to large groups of like-minded individuals. On the other side you have the people who like to triple-check every number, every measurement, every fact to make sure it all makes sense; plus it doesn’t help that they are stereotypically allergic to public speaking. In that kind of contest the faith group state their opinion accompanied by fudgy or zero facts and the science folk ask for more statistics, more information to back up the faith-based opinion. After that, the discussion just becomes its own living animal until it runs out of food and it dies off—never fully resolved. Eventually someone stumbles across the emaciated creature along the side of the road, feeds it, and poof—it’s back to cause trouble.

I wish more people in the middle started yelling louder than the crazy people on the edge.

Tagged as: , , , , , , , , , ,
Categorized as: Rationality

Elegance

The abstract concept that rates a solution among other possible solutions. Elegant solutions in both physics and programming are often desired, since they represent a fusion between simplicity and complexity, sparseness and density, brevity and usefulness. In the end, you are searching for the best structure to represent some information or process—most of the time, that ideal solution is the elegant one.

The brain can sense elegance on a gut level. When I look at the code I write, I can’t tell you necessarily why something is more or less elegant than something else within the code, but I can tell you when something is off-kilter. It doesn’t feel quite right, so I refactor and reorganize until it makes unified sense as a whole.

Refactoring sometimes feels like reducing the number of complex items to the absolute minimum so that the possibility of future errors is decreased. Harmony is ensured. Elegance is fashioned from emptiness—from the blankness of a disk-file.

Tagged as: , ,
Categorized as: Analysis

Space flight

Lately, I’ve been reading up on NASA’s past, present, and future.

It would seem as though they are returning to the UNIX methodology of building a whole bunch of reliable, simple components that are used together to the get the job done rather than one horrifically complex component. In the past, the simplest answer was big rockets with stuff on top used to get off of the planet. This worked. This was how we got to the moon.

Then we built the space shuttle and we really haven’t done anything cool since. Of course orbiting the earth in a livable vehicle is a great accomplishment—the problem is that it doesn’t really get us anywhere closer to any of the standard sci-fi space travel timelines. We’ve just kinda been stuck on a plateau ever since we got the damn shuttles. This is my ideal extrapolated timeline for extrasolar travel:

  1. Get into space.
  2. Orbit the earth.
  3. Send pieces into space orbit and later assemble to form a freighter.
  4. Fill it with lots of supplies and mining equipment.
  5. Go to the moon & build a mining outpost (return to step 4 as necessary).
  6. Use materials from moon to forge components for moon habitat.
  7. Open the operations up to the private sector to get more funding.
  8. Use the environment of the moon to study harsh space environments and use the constant spaceflight between the earth and the moon to improve the transport mechanisms.
  9. Construct further components for a real space station on the moon because the energy required to escape the moon is far less than on earth.
  10. Learn how to build space stations with no gravity.
  11. Repeat the above steps as needed to get the “hang” of space engineering.
  12. Now we can start to think about Mars.
  13. Do for Mars what we did for the Moon.
  14. Leave the solar system.
  15. Colonize the solar system.
Tagged as: , , , ,
Categorized as: Tech

The gene pool needs some fracking bleach

I just hate to read the news and get so angry that I want to grab a chain gun and go cleanse the gene pool. Thank you Google News for upsetting me with this article about Bush wanting alternatives to Darwinism taught in school.

President George W. Bush stirred the debate on the teaching of evolution in schools when he said this week that he supported the teaching of alternative viewpoints—such as the theory of Intelligent Design—to help students “understand what the debate is about”.

There is no fracking debate, unless you’re trying to pull out that evolution is a theory, not a fact crap. Yes, evolution is a theory—but so is intelligent design. But when you look at which one holds more ground as a theory, the one with more verifiable evidence is most definitely not intelligent design.

And for those of you who say that intelligent design allows for evolution as long as a supernatural being of sorts is there to guide it, I say that you’re in violation of Occam’s Razor keep your crazy ideas to yourself.

[Addendum]

Once again, thank you Google News for feeding me more fuel on the subject:

The most prominent debate is underway in Kansas, where the conservative state board of education is expected to require the teaching of doubts about evolution to public high school students.

Someone should just fracking dissolve the Kansas state board of education and start over with some new people because the current board is borderline deserving of a good swift kick in the reproductive organs.

[edit: Aug 10th]

Rob pointed out to me that I shouldn’t be using Occam’s Razor to end my argument, which is sadly true, so I’ve modified that part of the post.

Tagged as: , , , , , , , ,
Categorized as: Rationality